Beatles News
John Lennon is considered by many to be a poet. But the Beatle revealed his more prosaic side in a letter penned in 1962 to his future wife Cynthia Powell, in which he declared: “I wish I was on the way to your flat with the Sunday papers and chocies and a throbber.”
The intimate missive, which includes a complaint about his bandmate Paul McCartney’s snoring, is now being sold at auction by Christie’s with a £30,000 to £40,000 estimate.
Written over five nights after concerts during their Hamburg residency in April 1962, Lennon, then aged 21, wrote: “I love love love you and I’m missing you like mad … I wish I was on the way to your flat with the Sunday papers and chocies and a throbber.
“I wonder why all the newspapers wrote about Stu … I haven’t seen Astrid since the day we arrived I’ve thought of going to see her but I would be so awkward.
“Paul’s leaping about on my head (he’s in a bunk on top of me and he’s snoring) … Shurrup Mcarntey [sic]!”
Source: theguardian.com/Jamie Grierson
She's Leaving Home was one of the most spellbinding moments on the Beatles’ 1967 magnum opus Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. A heartstring-tugging document of coming of age angst, its sweeping orchestral arrangement supported a lyric that was inspired by a very real story.
The Paul McCartney-penned narrative gently expanded on a young girl’s decision to leave her stuffy, conservative parents’ home and - at Wednesday morning at 5 o’clock (as the day begins) - sneaks out to join the man (from the motor trade) that she was going to start her new life with.
Marrying sentiment with rebellion, She's Leaving Home balances a sympathetic, and nostalgic, longing for the past with the increasing rejection of conservatism then rife within 1960s youth culture.
This was characterised by its parent-perspective chorus lyric - sung in typically spine-tingling fashion by John Lennon.
We're not the first to say it, and we won't be the last, but it's wonderful stuff all round. But the unlikely, fateful layers behind its origin deepen its magic…
Firstly, there's that newspaper story that McCartney based his lyric on. Within the February 27th 1967 edition of the Daily Mail, a story that ran with the headline 'A-level girl dumps car and vanishes', detailed how a young schoolgirl - Melanie Coe - had disappeared from her family home in London’s Stamford Hill. Not even taking her car (an Austin 1100) or any of her wardrobe full of clothes - only the clothes she was wearing that day.
This had lead her extremely worried parents to contact the national press, with her father telling the paper that, “I cannot imagine why she should run away. She has everything here… even her fur coat.”
Melanie, whose hasty exit was spurred by finding out that she was pregnant, would later turn up safe and sound. She wasn't aware that the newspaper story had inspired She's Leaving Home until many years later.
In later life, she explained to the press that while her parents did in fact provide her with all the material possessions she could ever need, what she wanted most of all was some kind of emotional closeness. "As a 17-year-old I had everything money could buy - diamonds, furs, a car - but my father and mother never once told me they loved me,” Coe told the Daily Mail in 2007, echoing the dynamic presented in McCartney's lyric.
Source: musicradar.com/Andy Price
On This Day, June 11, 2002…
Beatles legend Paul McCartney married his second wife, Heather Mills, a former model and activist, whose leg was amputated in 1993 after she was run over by a police motorcycle in London.
The couple wed at Castle Leslie in the village of Glaslough in County Monaghan, Ireland, with the celebration attended by several celebrities, including McCartney’s Beatles bandmate Ringo Starr.
The wedding took place four years after the death of McCartney’s first wife, Linda McCartney, from cancer.
McCartney and Mills welcomed their first and only child together, daughter Beatrice, in 2003, and three years later announced they had separated, with their acrimonious divorce finalized in 2008.
McCartney went on to marry a third time, to New Yorker Nancy Shevell, in 2011. They are still married to this day.
Source: everettpost.com/ABC News
History is rarely kind to the third voice in a group that changed the world. But George Harrison didn’t just leave The Beatles in 1970 — he arrived.
And arrive he did with All Things Must Pass, a sprawling, audacious triple album that served as both a catharsis and a declaration. Central to that project was My Sweet Lord, a track that remains — five decades on — a towering moment in solo Beatles history. A spiritual lament disguised as a pop song. A cross-cultural anthem that dared to blend gospel exultation with Eastern devotion. A transcendent piece of music that, as it happened, may not have been entirely original.
Harrison wrote My Sweet Lord in Copenhagen in December 1969 during a creative burst on tour with Delaney & Bonnie. Surrounded by fellow believers in music’s power — Billy Preston, Eric Clapton — Harrison began piecing together a track that was less “boy meets girl” and more “soul meets divinity.” Its DNA was gospel, its mantra was Krishna. The chords were Preston’s, the “hallelujahs” came from Delaney Bramlett. Harrison brought the sincerity. “I don’t feel guilty or bad about it,” he would later insist.
As the song climbed the charts in 1971, comparisons to The Chiffons’ He’s So Fine surfaced. And not unjustly. A court would ultimately rule that Harrison had “subconsciously” lifted the melody. Intent was irrelevant. Legally, it was still plagiarism.
It didn’t help that music industry shyster Allen Klein complicated the legal fallout to an almost Shakespearean degree. The case dragged for years. The resolution came decades later. Harrison, for his part, doubled down on the song’s intent. My Sweet Lord wasn’t about the charts — it was about God.
Ironically, Harrison wasn’t even the first to release the track. That honour fell to Billy Preston, who issued it months before George’s own version. It barely cracked the charts. Harrison’s, however, soared. It became the first post-Beatles solo number one and the best-selling solo single by any member of the Fab Four during the 1970s.
The song would return to the top in 2002, in the shadow of Harrison’s death. It wasn’t just nostalgia. My Sweet Lord remained relevant — in its message, in its longing, in its unshakable sincerity.
Source: classichits.ie/Jake Danson
Brimming with an overflow of material, The Beatles uncorked The White Album in 1968. Technically titled The Beatles, it was the first and only double album that they’d release in their career.
The White Album offers just about every type of music imaginable over the course of its four sides. It also offers some fantastic factoids and trivial information about its making, including these five juicy tidbits.
The Beatles started writing many of the songs for The White Album while on retreat in India in 1968, learning meditation at the foot of the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. As such, several songs were thinly veiled depictions of actual events from the camp and the people involved in them. “Dear Prudence” referenced Prudence Farrow (sister of actress Mia) and her refusal to come out of her tent. “The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill” was a jibe at a gung-ho hunter within the entourage. And “Sexy Sadie” was originally titled “Maharishi”. The song reflected how John Lennon ultimately felt let down by the “Giggling Guru”.
Many, including certain Beatles themselves, have pointed to the White Album sessions as the beginning of the end for the band. No longer as tight as they once were, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, and George Harrison often worked in separate studios on the tracks they’d written. Meanwhile, Ringo Starr began the sessions feeling like he no longer had any connection with the other three. To that end, he briefly left for a boating holiday. In his absence, the band carried on and recorded both “Back In The U.S.S.R.” and “Dear Prudence” with Paul McCartney handling the drums. Plenty for “Paul Is Dead” Believers
Paul McCartney is very much alive and well and still thrilling us with his albums and concerts. But the rumor of his untimely demise in an auto accident, which gained international steam in 1969, was already circulating circa the making of the White Album. For those inclined to believe such a thing, the double album provided clues galore. The gibberish at the end of “I’m So Tired” and sections in “Revolution 9” were supposed to refer to McCartney’s fate when played backward. “Don’t Pass Me By” mentions a car crash. Most notable was John Lennon’s assertion that “the walrus was Paul” on “Glass Onion”. John was just having fun with all that nonsense, not making some oblique reference to death as some believed.
Source: americansongwriter.com/Jim Beviglia
During the pandemic, Ian Leslie wrote a Substack essay called “64 Reasons to Celebrate Paul McCartney,” arguing that despite his accomplishments, the ex-Beatle was underrated. But he didn’t delve much into McCartney’s relationship with John Lennon, writing, “I’m trying to keep this essay-length and that subject, inexhaustibly fascinating, is a book in itself.”
Inspired by this, Leslie went and wrote that book: “John & Paul: A Love Story in Songs.” Despite a seemingly endless parade of Beatles books, Leslie offers a fresh take, telling the story of the band through the duo’s relationship and the story of their relationship through the songs they were singing.
In a video interview from London, Leslie said most previous tomes recount the facts of the story without doing the music justice – “which is what this is all about and you can’t understand them without understanding the music” – or failed to explore the pair’s relationship “with depth or emotional intelligence.”
He was initially hesitant to pitch a book, since he wasn’t a music writer. Still, as a journalist, he’d written two books about human behavior that were relevant to understanding the Beatles’ genius: “Curious: the Desire to Know and Why Your Future Depends on It” and “Conflicted: How Productive Disagreements Lead to Better Outcomes.”
“The idea of how curiosity leads to creativity and how you can have productive conflict was central to their music,” Leslie says. Even early on in Liverpool, “when they were kind of crap musicians, they already had the personalities” that would create this unparalleled future.
After his essay went viral, providing rave responses from musicians and music experts he could use to pitch a book, he realized “even though I didn’t really have music credentials, I’d invented my own credentials.”
Source: whittierdailynews.com/Stuart Miller
The Beatles are often hailed as geniuses of pop, but John Lennon shrugged off grandiose claims about his talent.
Loading your audio article
Loading audio...
The Beatles were legends in their own lifetime.
Countless books were written about the band in the decade they were together. Many more have been written in the 55 years since the breakup.
Were The Beatles in Disney's classic movie The Jungle Book?
How The Beatles became the ultimate Motown band
Arguably the best is Hunter Davies's The Beatles: The Authorised Biography.
The only authorised account of the band written while they were a going concern, Davies published the book in 1968 having spent 18 months with the group, speaking extensively with the band themselves as well as thei friends, family and associates.
While the book is the origin of many of the now-canonical stories about The Beatles, it's written with a rare mix of respect and distance that, together with its contemporaneous nature, sets it apart from most other biographies.
So many Beatles bios focus on the musical genius of the Fab Four, painting the group – and especially John Lennon and Paul McCartney – as uniquely talented figures magically spinning gold from straw like a pair of pop Rapunzels.
John and George in a rare moment of calm during The Beatles’ first visit to America. Davies doesn't go in for any of this mythmaking.
Source: goldradio.com/Mayer Nissim
For the most part, the Beatles had a keen sense of which member should take on lead vocals. Most of their catalog feels right and just–every member playing to their strengths. However, there are a few songs that could’ve done well with a switcharoo. Below, find three Beatles songs that arguably beg for a different frontman.
“When I’m Sixty Four”
While “When I’m Sixty Four” screams “Paul McCartney”, it would have an entirely different tone if Ringo Starr were to have been the lead vocalist. From McCartney’s point-of-view, this Beatles song is a syrupy-sweet mark of devotion. Like many of his best tracks, “When I’m Sixty Four” sees McCartney wear his heart on his sleeve when he sings, Will you still need me, will you still feed me / When I’m sixty-four? If this song had been given to Starr, it would’ve been a light-hearted tune, akin to “Yellow Submarine”. It would’ve been given a shot of humor–one that would’ve likely helped this song in its heyday. Many, like John Lennon, felt this tune was a little too schmaltzy for the Beatles. Starr’s irreverent take would’ve helped to cut some of the heavy-lifting fans had to do.
“Across the Universe”
On paper, “Across the Universe” seems more like a song George Harrison would’ve written amid his Hare Krishna days. It’s just heady enough to give off the impression of higher enlightenment and meditative practice. Lennon sings this song perfectly well. His distinctive vocals helped make this song a classic in the Beatles’ catalog. However, we dare to say that Harrison on lead vocals could’ve made an even bigger splash. But, all’s well that ends well, we guess. Harrison had plenty of songs that flexed his soul-searching intellect.
Source: americansongwriter.com/Alex Hopper
Everyone knows John, Paul, George, and Ringo — the Beatles who rocked the world. But behind every great band is a squad of secret weapons, the unsung legends who kept the magic alive. Meet the “Fifth Beatles”: the managers, musicians, and mates who played crucial roles in the Fab Four’s rise to superstardom. From early bandmates to behind-the-scenes masterminds, their stories are just as fascinating as the music itself.
Stuart Sutcliffe
The Beatles’ original bassist and close friend of John Lennon, Sutcliffe was as much a visual architect of the band’s early image as he was a musician. His moptop hairstyle set the style for the band, even if his playing was less than polished. Sadly, he left the band early and passed away young.
Pete Best
Drummer before Ringo, Pete Best toured and played with the Beatles during their crucial Hamburg and Liverpool days. Despite being replaced just before their big break, Best’s role in the band’s development is undeniable, earning him a solid claim to the title.
Chas Newby
A temporary bassist who filled in briefly after the band returned from Germany, Newby played a handful of shows before returning to university. His brief tenure helped the Beatles keep their momentum before McCartney took over on bass.
Jimmie Nicol
For eight shows on the 1964 world tour, Nicol stepped in as drummer when Ringo was ill. His stint was short but historic, making him the “fifth Beatle” on tour, albeit briefly.
Brian Epstein
The Beatles’ manager, and arguably the most important figure in their rise to superstardom. Epstein’s business savvy, belief in the band, and grooming helped transform them from a local Liverpool act into global icons. McCartney and Martin called him the real “fifth Beatle.”
Source: thatericalper.com/Eric Alper
The Museum of Contemporary Art of Montenegro (MSUCG) announced the opening of the exhibition Yoko Ono called “Unfinished”, scheduled for Thursday, June 19th at 20 p.m., in the exhibition spaces of the Petrović Palace and the Perjanički dom in Kruševac, Podgorica. The exhibition curators are Maša Vlaović, Gunar B. Kvaran and Connor Monahan.
Yoko Ono is one of the key figures of avant-garde and conceptual art of the 20th and 21st centuries. Her work knows no boundaries; it moves fluidly between experiment, performance, poetry, music and film, while her tireless social and political activism, especially in the field of women's rights and peace initiatives, forms the core of her work.
Her art breaks down traditional boundaries between artistic disciplines and rejects the passive role of the audience, inviting each individual to become an active participant, co-creator, and agent of change.
A wide spectrum of creativity
From her early “instructional works” from the 1950s, through performances and films that call for collective action, to contemporary installations, Yoko Ono builds an authentic artistic language in which the personal and the universal, the poetic and the political, the spiritual and the physical constantly intertwine.
Source: en.vijesti.me/Vijesti